tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559002410879446409.post2280690728033150326..comments2024-03-28T16:12:40.861+01:00Comments on Electrospaces.net: An NSA eavesdropping case studyP/Khttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12681178058475882593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559002410879446409.post-44593214116254424632013-09-28T02:49:02.981+02:002013-09-28T02:49:02.981+02:00Thank you very much for this clarifying addition! ...Thank you very much for this clarifying addition! I rearranged the slides in the order of the original numbering.P/Khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12681178058475882593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4559002410879446409.post-10903689634541313342013-09-28T01:58:57.517+02:002013-09-28T01:58:57.517+02:00Slides out of order, this actually matters. (use ...Slides out of order, this actually matters. (use the image numbers)<br /><br />When viewed in the correct order, it tells a story first explains the contact graphs, and then shows 2 case studies. And gives conclusions. It says Nieto's email was read, but Rousseff's was not.<br /><br />The evidence for this it the two one-time-work slides, one is for Rousseff, and the other for Nieto.<br /><br />It shows that with Nieto, they generated the 2-hop contact graph, and extracted SMS, and dumped the results into DISHFIRE. DISHFIRE is definitely a database. It shows up in the Privacy violations report as such. And in the perhaps too reveling resume of a programmer. (I had to pull it from a google cache, he goes on about how he wrote a program to query 2 instances of the dishfire database that the last programmer couldn't get working)<br /><br />BUT with Rousseff, only the contact graph was generated. Rousseff is a good deal madder then Nieto right now, though less was done to her. Though knowing that she was, in fact tortured by an oppressive regime may explain her reactions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com